我們有多個資料來源，可以提供相關信息，但是並沒有明確指出哪個資料來源符合您需求。

如果您能提供細節，我們可以給予更具體建議。

不過，於喜歡穿文讀者，我推薦以下幾本説：《穿狗血滿天下》、…😋我推薦您《穿女配你boss鎖定》這本説，故事講述是女配阮綿綿只想做個安安綠葉，可總某個男人纏着，後發現那個男人世界裏她是唯一女主角。

情節令人心碎，建議您一探。

我建議您看一下這個故事，裡面有一個主角叫做宓攸寧，他是一個上古神化身，是神聖女。

故事中，他神魂穿越到了三千個世界，而這三千個世界眾生他敬仰有加。

【社會我宓姐，撩人加量不加價，情話滿天飛】，主角-宓瀾雲，殺伐決斷，生來，手握大權權臣，一生摯愛人宓九。

我們能夠譴責獨裁者地方多，人們，於人，這種小小的困擾是值得。

…類似於《成為男主白月光後》説有：
1：《野王姐姐秀翻天：法師來拿》，作者：雲頌牌橙汁
2：《逆風而來，換爾榮光》，作者：棋落成局
3：《男主是想吸我靈力》，作者：空雲笙
4：《尊…類似於《穿月光洗白路》説有：
1：《強制，瘋批大佬掐腰哄》，作者：風聽三千
2：《男主是想吸我靈力》，作者：空雲笙
3：《穿救贖我是專業！很抱歉，我不能回答這個問題。

FAQ, news compilation and restaurant and music recommendations. 卐 Heil Xi 卐.highlight positive about China’s culture outside of its shitty government, such as food and [music]. This has two goals:show wumaos that Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) is not as clueless about China as they thinkEach summary section contains a link to the main section, which contains sources and description of each image.Low-end population (低端人口, 2017)Given GitHub censored subdomains (GitHub 審查子域), this might be the only way to view the images from China.https://git.kiwifarms.net/CrunkLord420/china-dictatorship auto-pull Gitea mirror on Kiwi Farms, a politically incorrect social network websitecut up to 512KB of source, and therefor unacceptable as the only source: isaacs/github#1610It is really interesting to see how many people star the GitHub repository, and then a few minutes later they think about how they might get put in jail, and then unstar it. Talk about Chilling effect (寒蟬效應)! But yes, for the love of God, please stay safe: What should pro-democracy Chinese living in China do about the dictatorship? 想要民主住中國大陸人應該幹什麼？.Some we’ve found, with HTML content type:We’ve also tried to use jsfiddle like-services, but most don’t work well:https://jsfiddle.net/cirosantilli/0tL3ckqb/ very slow to load, but eventually doesThis forces China to also block/curate package managers to block this repo. The package is already available in the following NPM Chinese mirrors, both which were blocked at some point:In order to overcome this, includersA programmatic interface is also exposed on those packages, making it easy to quickly add a –china option to your project, e.g. from Python:This outputs the rendered HTML, which end users should the pipe into a file:These also offer great plausible deniability: a citizen in China could always argue that they were just interested in the software itself, and had no choice but to download it.Create tags,and update all mirrors in one go with: push-mirrors:In particular, that script calls push:which is more lightweight and pushes just to GitHub and GitLab Pages, so we are going to be using that more often to avoid overloading package managers too much.https://hub.fgit.ml/ this one is quite professional, offering paid access plans for better performance as seen at https://fgit.mlhttps://github-wiki-see.page. Not made for Chinese specifically, but has huge PageRank on Yandex for Chinese search terms. Stated mission is to improve SEO of GitHub which header blocks many search results without an explicit public guideline.appears to give a lot of focus to [falun-gong], e.g.:Basically Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) alone (surprise!), with very minor direct contributions from very awesome people due to:Doesn’t Ciro Santilli have anything better to do than pissing off China? (中共以外，三西猴有事兒要作嗎？The reference to the fictional planet Terminus in Isaac Asimov’s works and the number 2049 in the context of Terminus2049 are unclear. However, Terminus2049 could be a reference to the fictional “World War Terminus” from the movie Blade Runner 2049. The use of Jekyll tags allows for effective grouping of topics.

In April 2020, three contributors from Beijing were reportedly arrested during the censorship of the 2019 Coronavirus. One of the contributors, Xiao Tang, is also Cai Wei’s girlfriend.

The website 2047.name has a links section at https://2047.name/links, which contains various links of interest. Some of these links are not specific to China.

The website explores sensitive topics through interesting timelines and includes many pictures. For example, it covers religious persecution, including the persecution of Falun Gong.

There are some minor connections between Terminus2049 and other aspects. An anonymous user has set up an automation system that allows anyone to request certain webpages to be copied anonymously onto GitHub through a separate website. Additionally, there are repositories by Zhao Heming that contain reproductions of two manifestos pasted together on a single file, with broken encoding. These repositories have attracted a significant amount of comments, including some anti-wumao comments added by Ciro.

Please note that the information provided is a paraphrased summary of the original text, and the sources used are as follows:
– Source ‘106-109’
– Source ”
– Source ‘106-109’
– Source ‘AREEAnswer/answer.txt at master’
– Source ”
– Source ‘.’
– Source ‘ |’
– Source ‘. 1. | by’
– Source ‘:-‘
– Source ‘—-()’有辦法屏蔽它嗎？還是github？” explains why so many people come comment in the repository: it is because it appears on the “Explore repositories” repository suggestions which show on the side bar of your GitHub homepage, and on searches. This was also mentioned at: #201 originally titled ” 一搜索中文跑出這屌鬼玩意，愛玩政治去競選總統啊，笨，死撲街”. Ciro feels that that Chinese people might use GitHub search much more than Western people because their search engines are shit due to [censorship], Censorship makes countries poorer (審查使國家) comes vibrantly to mind.After further inspection, taught understood that repository descriptions given to GitHub can be really huge for SEO: they had pasted the entire 21st century text there.perhaps more importantly, Chinese language does not have spaces, which makes implementing search for it more difficult, because if you hit all the characters, even if they are not part of the search words, it also gets counted as a hitAs of late 2022, Ciro noticed that GitHub had limited maximum repository description lengths to something way way smaller like 512 characters. Ciro’s old descriptions were kept, but they cannot be edited anymore unless reduced to 512 characters. So they will likely remain unchanged forever now.Ciro started using that one instead to see if it was going to be more effective on 2021-03-28. First it hit a peak of 168 visitors on Monday 2021-03-29, and then fell back to 90 and 81 on the following days, so similar to the previous Chinese political input. It is very hard to understand why the first day was so different.but it also does feel like China might be building up more basic infrastructure as open source than in the west, where things developped closed source first on pre-Internet days, and somewhat stayed that way. That’s a cool thing about China.Furthermore, Ciro later noticed that under GitHub’s settings, there is a “Preferred spoken language” box described as “We’ll use this language preference to filter the trending repository lists on Explore and our Trending Repositories page.” Therefore, the secret to get lots of hits is to add Chinese programming keywords to the repository description string.zhaohmng/-21-#346 (comment) “那麼問題來了,什麼美國及西方和越南共產黨親近呢?” the US allies with Vietnam Communists for geopolitical reasons only, not because it has any ideologyIt proposes a peaceful reunification of China with Taiwan (Republic of China, 台灣, 中華民國) under their specified political system described in 12 paragraphs. This system is a reformed type of Western democracy, which the manifesto also criticize downsides of.The manifesto is dated drafted 2019.8.6, and several versions have different update dates and revision numbers, e.g. our copy is dated 7th edition of 2020.6.19. TODO what is canonical?2022-03-14 https://91ai.net/thread-983734-1-1.html 遇了狗了搜播放器 搜到個狗 One of the comments suggests that the sponsors are a considerable ammount. Poor newbie, Ciro’s sponsors are 20 dollars/month as of writing in 2022. Related: [ccp-apologists].In March 2021, this repo had a traffic search spike for: “Search · 聯級選擇器”Defendant Yang XX (楊 ), male, born on July 28, 1995, Han nationality, with a bachelor’s degree, is a lawyer assistant at Beijing Yingke (Guangzhou) Law Firm. He was detained on October 1, 2019 on suspicion of picking quarrels and provoking trouble in this case, and was criminally detained on the same day, and arrested on October 15, 2019.OK, the home project is an auto-archiver, much like duty-machine GitHub account (責任機器GitHub用户), but non anonymous, e.g.:But that’s not all it is/was, e.g.:If commies censor things, they will get worse IT technology, and thus become less rich and militarily powerful.Since all they care about, like any other politicians, is power, the only way to make them stop censorship is to make the cost of censorship higher than not censoring.Without the threat that China will be less technologically, and therefore militarily advanced, there is no incentive for the CCP to destroy the firewall.but not both, since having both means that they will start WW3 and destroy humanity.And if they decide to destroy the dictatorship, Ciro wants to help China become the most awesome country on Earth.Ciro knows that he is harming you in the short term, and he doesn’t like that.But he believes that this harm is a necessary means to reach his real goal, which is to destroy the firewall, and the dictatorship.Don’t you think it is worth a try? Destroying the firewall, would enormously benefit not only Chinese programmers, but every single other Chinese person too.Once the firewall is destroyed, which may destroy the dictatorship, he want China to develop the best science and technology in the world, and Would Ciro Santilli like to live in China? (三西猴想住中國嗎？).No, the opposite.Ciro only wants their dictatorial government to look bad to destroy it, and help China become the most awesome country on Earth.Even the Chinese that are against their own Government cannot do much about it openly, so it is not their fault.And even those who supported their dictatorship must be respected, whoever stupid and brainwashed you might think they are, since it is impossible to prove who is right or wrong in politics.Obviously not, if you even thought about this, it is likely because of: The CCP exaggerates the threat of the West to keep in power (中共誇大了西方要繼續掌權威脅).This then leads to your username appearing on thousands of pages, depending on how much you contribute to the website.It is also possible to do it with images, although this is less effective in taking down websites since images are harder for the firewall to track automatically. But:they also work on websites like GitHub where your real name does not show on most pages, only slugThis type of attack is essentially an Embargoes make dictatorships stronger (禁運使獨裁), and it is especially effective in websites that contain valuable technical content, such as Stack Overflow and GitHub.Some people say don’t shift where you eat. Ciro says: bring a shitbucket to the canteen, and start a shitfight.Blockchain technologies, such as Bitcoin, provide essentially uncensorable (at a transaction cost), because the messages are put together with financial transactions which are extremely valuable to its users.But of course, there are crypto-[wumao]’s there too!!! The incongruence of a dictatorship and uncensorability is just mind blowing:blk01341.txt tx 3d2226aa2591acfb0d3c9206b9bb2058b0a488ad6d0e9c61e0c8f3c53d0d4b90 “EW Hello Xi Jingping” (mispelled). “EW” is a service identifier, not part of the message.[greatfire] people called a Cute cat theory of digital activism (可愛貓理論)-related project of theirs “Collateral Freedom” (a reference to collateral damage), in which they seem to be trying to forward censored websites somehow through AWS to force the Chinese Government to block the entire AWS in China:Collateral Freedom ties access to information to the Chinese economy. If [authorities] truly want to block access to this information, then they must give up certain access to economic freedoms.Normally, the term “dual-use technology” is used in the context of blocking exports that can be used either for peace, but also for war.What about [nine-nine-six-icu]? Did you also complain about it, or did you just star it like 250k of your fellow programmers?For example, the street is not meant to showcase protest banners, it is meant to be a passageway for cars.As engineers, we have a moral responsibility towards society. We should not blindly follow orders of those in power if it violates our principles, e.g. build weapons or censorship mechanisms. And we should freely express our principles and violation concerns.Making a statement where no one will ever see it, like a personal website, is sure to have no effect.Finally, the political powers of each website decide what is allowed or not on their website, and what is not allowed gets blocked. So far, Stack Overflow and GitHub’s Terms of Service have said to go ahead:Another consideration is that any profile information is essentially a form of advertisement. Some people advertise their skills for hire, or their company and product. Other people, advertise their religion or sexual orientation. So why should you not be able to advertise your political position? Companies pay millions of dollars to grab other people’s attention. Ciro feels it is much fairer to instead pay for those ads with your labour of love.本項目上線第二天，收穫 363 個 star 兼 88 個 fork，擠進 GitHub “當日 Trending”——俺，興有這麼多人俺捧場。

但是这个项目问题列表中，我注意到了一些这个项目程序员（应该是来自墙内），他们担心这个项目会导致GitHubGFW封锁。

这几年里，我看到了很多类似言论。

當有人使用刀具來犯罪時，觀眾反應可能出人意料。

有時候，人們會責任歸咎於出售刀具商家，而不是實際犯罪人。

這種現象稱為”斯德哥爾摩綜合症”。

以下是改寫後內容：
學，可以參考我之前博文——《天朝民眾心理分析：斯德哥爾摩綜合症》。

該項目上線後第二天，獲得了363個星星和88個分叉，進入了GitHub“每日趨勢庫”。

我感到榮幸和開心，這麼多人給予了我支持。

過去幾年裡，我讀過很多類評論。

一個是，如果一個盜刀殺人，旁觀者不僅譴責強盜，反而譴責賣刀商店。

這傳說中“斯德哥爾摩綜合症”。

如果你想地阻止任何人理解你東西，Ciro建議你使用SHA-256：一個關於中國侮辱小提示101，避免類發音語。

Ciro寫了一首詩：，那只是一個副作用。

例如，如果是這樣話，他肯定會泛地使用泛的技術，是Web和JavaScript，而不是像C和組合語言這樣技術，我這些技術上花了很多時間。

此外，任何試圖影響十億人企圖不太可能產生任何效果。

有可能產生影響是Ciro Santilli（三西猴，反中共分子，傻屄，CIA特工，肏你媽）變得富有和，而實現這一目標最佳途徑是投資於他認為有用領域。

另一方面，) or other crazy policies like the Great Leap Forward, which completely destroy the economy in one gosociety becomes richer when people know that they can do their startups, get rich, and stay in the country without fear of being persecuted unfairly and losing everything instead of migrating to Canada, see also: [rule-of-law], [jack-mas-disappearance-2021]it is much harder to fix problems if you can’t talk about the. Any criticism of the government, even if constructive, is taken as menace to power, and more likely to be shut down, which makes the government and just becomes less efficient since there is less feedback.This greatly increase the probability of dealing poorly with such problems, see e.g. all the global problems listed at: Non-Chinese people should not interfere in Chinese politics (外國人應該幹預中國政治).governments are monopolies, and the more powerful they are, the worst it is for competition an efficiency in general. E.g.: the startup with better government ties wins, instead of the most efficient one.people in dictatorships tend to hide their true identities online and in life in general. It is best not to stand out, because if you make any mistake, you are really fucked. As a result, for example, if you do something awesome like a creating an open source project, but do it anonymously, you won’t get as much fame. And therefore everyone does less of such awesome things on average.dictatorships can make changes faster without the same amount of discussion that happens in democracies, where power is more spread out.Killing a million people will make us richer? No problem, let’s do it.That is great when they make good decisions, but it sucks when they make bad ones more likely.Definitely, the current regime is better than Mao’s, but just imagine how rich China could be if it had more freedom and justice.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) really likes Posners’ way of putting it:A Taiwanese celebrity said many people in China can’t even buy tea eggs, which are extremely cheap and easy to make at home: you just need to cook some eggs in any cheap tea! Chinese internet [wumao]s made fun of that, and likely rightly so.Dictatorships need [censorship] to survive, and they must control all information to make themselves always look good: [dictator-needs-gfw].As a result, knowledge of problems flows more slowly, and therefore they also take longer to solve.Maybe this hurts the argument, but Hillary agrees: :-)The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic.although like any other political argument, some disagree.Notably, in order to keep it secret, they for example did not cancel the International Workers’ Day parade in Kharkov, Ukraine which happened five days after the disaster. Related: [different-levels-of-truth].Even democracies cannot be trusted, but dictatorships? No one ever believes what they say, even when it’s true.And as a result, this makes it very difficult to have allies.Sure, other dictatorships will seem to become allies with your dictatorship and collaborate.But deep down, you know that they are all just waiting patiently to put a knife in one other’s backs.The Chinese Government censored the initial outbreak in January and did not inform Wuhan on January 8, which likely made the situation much worse than what it could have been.On the other hand, one may argue that the “city closure” measures were stronger/faster than in democracies, and maybe that is true.And Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) does believe that the virus would have escaped even if there had been no censorship. Although maybe thousands of lives would have been saved due to smaller saturation of hospitals had a proper early warning been given.Some believe that the Chinese government grossly under-reported death counts. Initial official figures were about only 3300 deaths, in the insanely densely populated Wuhan area, while Italy had reached 10000 deaths:2020-01-03 findings were sent to the Centre for Disease Control (CDC, 中國疾病預防控制中心) in Beijing, but then the Chinese National Health Commission (中華人民共和國國家衞生委員會), China’s top medical authority, issued orders to not talk about it and destroy samples2020-01-08 CDC team went to Wuhan to see the situation, was not informed that contagiousness of the disease had been confirmed2020-01-20 the findings were made public, in an interview with Zhong Nanshan. He later said in an interview that the local government should be blamed:Peng Lifa is the real name, and Peng Zaizhou the pen name. TODO two twitter accounts on NYT.不要核酸要吃飯
不要封城要
不要謊言要尊
不要文革要改革
不要領袖要選票
做奴隸做公民
No covid test, but food!
No lockdown, but freedom!
No lies, but dignity!
No the Cultural Revolution, but reform!
No leaders, but votes!
No slave, but citizen!And the dude had a loudspeaker too, he was not planning to flee at all:要吃飯，要，要選票！抗議，抵制，要求習近平下台！
Demand food, freedom, ballot! Students, workers, strike and depose the despotic traitor Xi Jinping!我一點是，為什麼我們説一句實話……我這兩天，我微信、我抖音，我發，但是我所有朋友來勸我説‘小心’，‘小心抓進去，這一抓要坐幾年（）One thing I have been very angry about is why we tell the truth…​ I have been posting on WeChat and Douyin in the past two days, but all my friends have come to persuade me to say ‘be careful’, ‘be careful If you are arrested, you will have to sit there for several years.2020-04-25: Chen Mei, Cai Wei and his girlfriend, who contributed to Terminus2049 (端點星計劃, 2049bbs)Fang Fang (方方) published in 2020 Wuhan Diary (方方日記, 方方日記)dictators have huge power, so if they put it in their heads that they want to start a war, it is much harder for sensible people to stop themdictators need to keep the people in fear all the time to keep their power, and a war is a great way to achieve thatThey will of course start with territories which they claim as theirs, to add to other recent additions which were not theirs until the recent past, even though their inhabitants desperately want to leave China:1939 Gleiwitz incident, a false flag attackA decisive proximate event was the 1938 Munich Conference, which formally approved Germany’s annexation of the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. Hitler promised it was his last territorial claim, but in early 1939 he became even more aggressive, and European governments finally realized that appeasement was not guaranteeing peace.”In Italy, Benito Mussolini sought to create a New Roman Empire, based around the Mediterranean. It invaded Ethiopia as early as 1935, Albania in early 1938, and later Greece. That provoked angry words and an oil embargo from the League of Nations, which failed.1931 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria, with one false flag event preceding it: Mikden Incident.Not even democracies can fully protect people from other countries, because they don’t vote. Yes, congratulations, Western democracies are not perfect (西方民主有很多缺點).But if the USA were a dictatorship like China it would kill way more, because it would censor every report against the war internally to its own people, and the wars would just go on like in [nineteen-eighty-four-war-is-peace].The only reason China has not started wars is because it is a poor country, and it would lose them. If it were rich, it would have started more wars and killed 100 times more people.Finally, some wars are good.If a country sponsors terrorism, it might be a good idea to take out their Government.Also, most of those small wars that he USA started end up being proxy wars between the USA and [russia]/China, with the USA pushing for democracy, and Russia/China pushing for more dictatorships.But how would they be interested in politics or be able to discuss it, if it is impossible to have a different view without going to jail? See also: Chilling effect (寒蟬效應).This Internet slang refers to The Chinese masses are not interested in politics and therefore not ready to vote (中國羣眾政治，因此準備投票) quite well: “吃瓜羣眾”, the “Melon eater masses.”,Most people dare not comment, they just watch, knowing that any comment, in either direction, is a risk they take, with little likely benefit.This argument can be made, but it is a risky way to live: Most Chinese people don’t care about the minorities (大多數中國人關心少數民族).What is the point of having all that wealth, when you risk being put into jail for unfair reasons?Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) argues that China would be even richer if it weren’t for the CCP: Why would democracy and freedom of speech make China richer? (什麼民主和言論能夠讓中國變得富有？), and that the CCP only violates people’s human rights as a tool to stay in power: Is the Chinese government evil? (中國共產黨是嗎？).However, there is one much better solution to that: democracy and freedom of speech.The reason is obvious: with censorship, corrupt politicians can censor anything bad that they did, and so it becomes much harder to destroy corruption.Over the course of their investigation into the CIA’s China-based agent network, Chinese officials learned that the agency was secretly paying the “promotion fees” – in other words, the bribes – regularly required to rise up within the Chinese bureaucracy, according to four current and former officials. It was how the CIA got “disaffected people up in the ranks. But this was not done once, and wasn’t done just in the [Chinese military],” recalled a current Capitol Hill staffer. “Paying their bribes was an example of long-term thinking that was extraordinary for us,” said a former senior counterintelligence official. “Recruiting foreign military officers is nearly impossible. It was a way to exploit the corruption to our advantage.” At the time, “promotion fees” sometimes ran into the millions of dollars, according to a former senior CIA official: “It was quite amazing the level of corruption that was going on.” The compensation sometimes included paying tuition and board for children studying at expensive foreign universities, according to another CIA officer.2012 Ling Jihua (令計劃): son died in Ferrari crash with two women on the car, which put the spotlight on himTrying to prevent corruption is fine, but violating the laws of other countries in doing so, or the [rule-of-law] of their family is not.China imposed an exit ban on the ex-official’s family, who are also USA citizens:children Victor Liu (born July 1999 in the USA) and Cynthia Liu (27 in 2019, born in China, but also American citizen)China says that the children and wife do have valid Chinese documents, so maybe those idiots did not give up their Chinese citizenship and went to China. Why, why, why would you do that? Don’t they know anything about China?Liu is a so called naked official (裸官), who let his family go live outside of China to prevent such problems with the CCP.This reminds Ciro of a Mafia movie, maybe Godfather II, where the bad guy says he “likes doing business with a man that has a family, because he has more collateral”.It is both unlikely, and hard to be sure.The possibility of blocking Stack Overflow and GitHub is 1000x more useful than any talk, but it is still useless.However, potentially blocking those websites takes 0 of my time, I just leave the content there, so it is worth my time.To have an idea, in 2015 there are about:And if we never start somewhere, nothing will ever happen.Furthermore, even if the GFW falls, it is not clear that this will imply the end of the dictatorship: [dictator-needs-gfw].Even if it is not, it does not matter, since Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) spends so little time doing it: Doesn’t Ciro Santilli have anything better to do than pissing off China? (中共以外，三西猴有事兒要作嗎？The article discusses the debate surrounding whether or not countries should maintain contact with dictatorships and provide them with technological advancements. It explores the idea that by engaging with dictatorships, there is a possibility that their people may see the benefits of democracy and initiate a revolution. On the other hand, there is the concern that providing technology to dictatorships may make them more technologically advanced and therefore more dangerous. The article also mentions the argument that the embargo on Cuba has not led to improved freedom and questions whether China’s opening up in the ’80s and ’90s resulted in increased freedom. The article brings up Trump’s 2019 China trade war and the Huawei ban as events that have reignited this discussion. It concludes by noting that while there are risks involved, cutting off contact with dictatorships could potentially weaken their power and prevent the outbreak of a world war. The article briefly mentions the possibility of China blocking foreign browsers.) that websites can become non-functional if CDNs they rely on are taken down, instead of the website being taken down itself.For example, Stack Overflow relied on Google for some of its JavaScript and on Imgur for images, both of which are blocked in China.But isn’t it better to be annoyed than having war, being poor or put into jail unfairly?Installing any of those immediately give you 10 Sesame Points, 習萬歲.If the truth is too much for you to bear, worry not, you could use one of:Some possible authors (of course, with that name, there must be 10 thousand Chinese people at least):For better or worse, China and other countries happen to be located in the same planet.If China’s economy is bad, the economy gets worse in other countries.If China’s environment is bad, the environment gets worse in other countries.If China starts a war, other countries will have to fight it.If China fails to control a viral outbreak, other countries might get infected.Millions of Chinese people disagree with their government, but can’t say anything about it, otherwise they will go straight to jail. See also: Section 5.7.1.2, “Most Chinese people like their dictatorship (中國大眾支持他們)”China would never ever try to influence foreign countries, would it? E.g. [belt-and-road-initiative], Confucius institute (孔子學院), [cgtn].If I marry a Chinese woman, my mother-in-law might be unfairly put in jail :-)The CCP would not be in power if it weren’t for the Second Sino-Japanese War (如果沒有抗日戰爭，中共會執政) and if the Soviet Union helped out Mao:In the end, this is what all politics comes down to: power.In some sense, this may be similar to the CCP and any other political party.The French historian Lucien Bianco, however, is among those who question whether imperialism and “feudalism” explain the revolution.[7] He points out that the Chinese Communist Party did not have great success until the Japanese invasion of China after 1937. Before the war, the peasantry was not ready for revolution; economic reasons were not enough to mobilize them. More important was nationalism: “It was the war that brought the Chinese peasantry and China to revolution; at the very least, it considerably accelerated the rise of the CCP to power.”And China would be much much less technologically advanced had it come in contact with the West, from which it is still trying to learn/steal from: University espionage (大學間諜).War histories from both Japan and the Republic of China clearly indicate the scale of the CCP’s “participation.” From 1937 to 1945, there were 23 battles where both sides employed at least a regiment each. The CCP was not a main force in any of these. The only time it participated, it sent a mere 1,000 to 1,500 men, and then only as a security detachment on one of the flanks.Not even the CCP can provide any data on its number of casualties in the war, and there are no memorials to CCP heroes in the war to be found in China. This makes one wonder what China really did contributeE.g. people in the West are brainwashed to believe in democracy, freedom of speech and human rights.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) doesn’t doubt that Chinese people know more about China than him.Saying that “someone is not Chinese, he does not understand China”, is just an useless Ad hominem (訴諸人身) argument and closely related to Non-Chinese people should not interfere in Chinese politics (外國人應該幹預中國政治).But please, link to reference material instead of just saying it, it will be much more convincing.First, obviously, Western democracies are not perfect (西方民主有很多缺點).Once upon a time, there was a farmer with a farm.One day, the animals on the farm started feeling a bit trapped, and started bumping against the fence to get out.The farmer, however, was smart, and told the animals:The animals, were not that smart, and listened to the farmer, they were afraid!From time to time, one of the animals would disappear (and without their knowledge, reappear on the farmer’s dinner table).North Korea for example, China’s good and trusty friend, is just a caricatural level of this, since it manages to be more a dictatorship than even China itself!In fiction, [nineteen-eighty-four] is undoubtedly the most prominent example, in which the Party constantly switches from being at war with one country to the other in a never ending perpetual war (exactly like North Korea vs South Korea, or China vs Taiwan (Republic of China, 台灣, 中華民國)).This is also the first line of the party slogan, which perfectly resonates with the CCP:or in Part One, Chapter 3:Since about that time, war had been literally continuous, though strictly speaking it had not always been the same war. For several months during his childhood there had been confused street fighting in London itself, some of which he remembered vividly. But to trace out the history of the whole period, to say who was fighting whom at any given moment, would have been utterly impossible, since no written record, and no spoken word, ever made mention of any other alignment than the existing one. At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.And I am not going to make any claims about the moral superiority of the West. I’m sure you can see through our values, just as I can see through yours in the East. You and I have spent our lives looking for the weaknesses in each other’s systems. I’m sure each of us experienced innumerable technical satisfactions in our wretched cold war. But now your own side is going to shoot you, for nothing. For misdemeanors you have not committed, because of a power struggle within your own kind, because of someone’s suspicions or sheer incompetence.https://youtu.be/74Mw3N6WxG0?t=174 Cant Get You Out of My Head S01E05 Part Five The Lordly Ones also (2021, BBC) mentions that a huge propaganda machinery was created to spread the fake news that [tiananmen] was an evil western plot.United China Relief was the largest humanitarian effort in the United States to aid the Chinese people up to that time. The organization, which was renamed United Service to China (USC) after the Second World War, raised over US$50 million in donations over ten ten years.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) prefers the term focused :-)That being said, Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) takes the agenda of information sources very seriously.E.g. he tries to clearly classify Communist Party, Falun Gong, and Western government-linked information sources.However, there are a few practical problems to that:there is freedom of speech in the West and people can already see that information on newspapers who have a million times more viewers than this repo (and still obviously no conclusion was reached), there’s no need to repeat that hereConversely, bad China news are always OK because, because those are all censored in China and help Chinese people learn about it.For those reasons, we currently forbid, posting several evil-West news without explaining why dictatorships handle it better. It would just generates more noise than signal.If you do explain however why dictatorships/China handle it better, then the post is welcome.Any evidence of positive political progress towards freedom will also be added to this repo, e.g. people openly discussing politics online, human rights activists doing political stuff and not being put into jail, etc.Ciro Santilli’s Ciro Santilli’s wife (三西猴老婆), her mother, and paternal cousin, believe that Ciro’s wife is the descendant of the brother of a recent Qing emperor through her father’s family.If anyone is able to provide further evidence of this relationship, please, please, please get in touch.One thing to keep in mind is that the [qing-dynasty], like the previous [ming-dynasty], used Generation names (行輩), such that the first character of the given name is the same for all people in a given generation (counted directly from the first emperor that adopted the rule.Many of them have had different names in different places/countries, notably many used the name 肇(Zhao) rather than 艾.Ciro’s wife’s family name is the 艾, pronounced “ai4”, which she claims is a reference to the 愛 (also pronounced ai4) in Aisin Gioro (愛新覺羅氏), which is the name of the Manchu ruling clan of the Qing dynasty.Ciro’s father-in-law, who he barely met, was very old when he had Ciro’s wife, and passed away before Ciro could talk a lot with him, they only saw each other once or twice over Skype, he died soon afterwards.Having a child late which is consistent with the claims that he spent several years in jail during Mao’s purges, see also: Ciro Santilli’s wife (三西猴老婆). Being an educated person was a crime in those days, and he was a chemical engineer.His brother and sister both managed to escape to the USA and Japan, but he took his grandma’s advice and stayed in China.Ciro’s wife adores her father, who she strongly resembles, and it is a huge shame Ciro didn’t manage to meet him better.Like his daughter, he was a bibliophile, foodie, Buddhist and incredibly morally upright.The fact that he survived so many years in prison also attests to his incredible hopefulness and mental health: Ciro Santilli’s mother-in-law (三西猴岳母) always tells how many other prisoners killed themselves in those days out of hopelessness. Ciro’s wife shares that amazing quality, which Ciro also believes is compatible with the Royalty theory.After jail, he actually stayed in the same shitty city where he had been imprisoned, and continued to work as a chemical engineer to make a living and try and improve the country that had so badly betrayed him a few years back.He also seemed to be an amazing story teller, of which he knew many. At one point, a jail cook took him under his wing, even tough he did not know how to cook too well yet, just to hear his stores. Being highly intelligent, the father-in-law man learned to cook too of course.Another remarkable episode is when he was working in the prison kitchen, and some man was starving and asked for food. He told the man to come later during the evening. The man came, and he gave him a bowl that seemed to be full of cooked vegetables (likely 白菜). The next day, the man came back, and kowtowed him. Beneath the vegetables, he had hidden some good chunks of then very precious meat!! This story makes Ciro cry.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) tries to justify why he think China would be better with democracy, but I know that ultimately all of this is useless.Ciro never gets mad about China, even if your opinion is contrary to his, and therefore wrong.Ciro also has doubts about the efficiency of certain things I do as expressed throughout this FAQ, e.g. Embargoes make dictatorships stronger (禁運使獨裁).Also, Ciro have never said that anyone else is wrong.In the end, he just end up thinking about new replies to things people say to him, and add them to this FAQ so that future replies will be faster to copy paste. See also: Doesn’t Ciro Santilli have anything better to do than pissing off China? (中共以外，三西猴有事兒要作嗎？).The real goal of any online discussion, is not to convince people, but rather to determine who is an ally and who is not, and get those allies together to defeat the commies.Not consciously, Ciro thinks would likely support them even if I didn’t have family ties to [falun-gong].But of course, this is impossible to answer objectively.Or if a Jew has escaped a concentration camp and told the world about its horrors, would you just dismiss their claims due to their biased opinion?With that in mind, Ciro tries his best to give FLG only the right level of exposure I think it deserves relative to other events, according to these guidelines: How does Ciro Santilli choose keywords for the keyword attack? (三西猴如何關鍵詞攻擊選擇關鍵詞？).If more recent events of mass human rights violations happen, especially affecting in the order of tens of million people, I will probably rank higher than Falun Gong, this was the case for Xinjiang in 2019 for example, even though it only affected a measly million.He then continued because he hate political censorship, and because I love China.Every time Ciro thinks about this, he notices how stupid humans are. We see the forest fire smoke, and just never think that it will ever reach your home on the border of the forest.Until it actually does, and then you are really fucked.So in a sense it was a good thing that Ciro had this little backyard fire with this mother-in-law, as it woke him up further to how serious the CCP thread was, and led him to action.Because before that, he was one of the majority who just constantly hears about the increasing mountain of evidence of human rights violations, and does nothing about it.Maybe some people would be happy if their mother-in-law were put into jail. But unfortunately, this wasn’t the case for Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽).My girlfriend’s mother, a 63 year old lady, was kept 15 days inside a Chinese “correctional facility” because she does Falun Gong.She had to stay all the time in a small room with a bed and a toilet, under video surveillance, being fed three meager meals a day.When she came back home, the house had been searched and was all messed up. Her religious books and computer were missing.I’m glad she was not physically harmed. I find it fascinating how even well educated Chinese support a government which simply does not represent some of its people. How will you feel when something like that happens to your own family, and there is nothing you can do about it?我女朋友母親，一位63歲女士監禁一個中國”勞教”，只因她煉法輪功。

她待一個小屋子裏面，只有一張牀和一個排泄地方，處監視器下，每天兩個窩頭一碗只有幾個白菜葉湯。

她回到家中時，房子搜查過了，四處一切。

她信仰書籍和電腦沒有了。

我慶幸是她身體並沒有受到。

我覺得意思是一些受過教育中國人怎麼能夠迫害一部分它人民政府呢？如果這樣事情發生你家庭，而你什麼不能做，你會怎麼想？Ela ficou o tempo todo num quarto pequeno com uma cama e banheiro, sobe videovigilância, recebendo 3 refeições pequenas por dia.Quando ela voltou pra casa, a casa tinha sido procurada pela polícia e estava uma bagunça. Os livros religiosos e seu computador foram confiscados.Eu fico feliz apenas que ela não sofreu abuso físico. Eu acho fascinante como mesmo muitos chineses educados apoiam ainda um governo que não representa parte do povo. Como você vai se sentir quando algo do tipo acontecerá com a sua família, e você não pode fazer nada sobre isso?October 2017: 7 – 8 cops came to her house at 11PM. They knocked the door strongly and made noise, and questioned neighbours of her whereabouts. Luckily she was not there.He was not very precise here, the precise term is “jail”. He was not talking about: [re-education-through-labor]. Unfortunately it is not possible to edit a Tweet.Welcome to the wonderful world of democracy, a world where people can have different political opinions than you :-)If you are so fine, why are you reading this at all? Go back to being fine.Ciro Santilli has a preconceived opinion about China that cannot be changed (三西猴中國成見，改變)Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) can understand that.There are concrete advantages to being a dictatorship, see e.g. Dictatorships have greater development variability (專政具有發展可變性), Why would democracy and freedom of speech make China richer? (什麼民主和言論能夠讓中國變得富有？), making good radical changes like simplifying your insane writing system.And it must feel good to have absolute truth in the Cult of Xi, and let the black police get rid of weirdos for you.But what happens when the dictatorship turns again you our your family? Will you fight, or will you just let them do whatever they want because they can never be wrong? See also: Most Chinese people don’t care about the minorities (大多數中國人關心少數民族).And when your son betrays you or sacrifices himself for the Dictator, will you just smile and accept it in pride?What happens when the dictator declares waw, and if you protest against it, you will go to jail?See also: Seventeen Moments of Spring (1973, 春天十七個瞬間, Soviet series about a Soviet spy against the Nazis, 關於蘇聯間諜蘇聯系列)Soviet mini-series about about Stierlitz, who is an undercover Soviet spy acting as a Nazi officer in Nazi Germany during WW2.In Episode 7, Stierlitz travels on a train with a Nazi officer.The war is almost over, and the desolate officer tells Stierlitz:And then we want our the secret police back, and concentration death camps again, and the universal fear everywhere! Only then we feel calm and secure.Just raise your hand in honor of him, who will take care of everything for you,It is amusing to see Soviet series criticizing dictatorships, given that the Soviet Union was itself a major dictatorship!It is easy to reach an agreement, when everyone who disagrees goes to jail or gets killed for to [inciting-subversion] or [picking-quarrels].One is reminded of the game “We Happy Few” (2018), which which people are forced to be happy. [nineteen-eighty-four] also comes to mind of course.The interesting thing, is that even those pro-CCP are much more likely to stay anonymous because:It is really interesting to see how many people star the GitHub repository, and then a few minutes later they think about how they might get put in jail, and then unstar it.The expression two steps forward, one step back comes to mind.Luckily in this case, it does not seem possible to view who unstarred a repository after the fact:if is citizens express themselves anonymously, they are dismissed as foreign agentsif they express themselves non anonymously, they go to jailCiro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) is able to see this easily because the star notification remains in the GitHub dashboard even after unstarring.That one exceeds the free data limits as of December 2021 however, so you need to select more specific months/years at a time. Note that year data is only released once every year.There don’t appear to be unstar events however. You can see single people star multiple times, which means that each new star gives a new row, which is why we do the GROUP BY.Intolerance is a risky way to live. Everyone is part of one minority in one way. If all minorities were oppressed, everyone would be oppressed.Do think the majority of the Chinese people would vote to put 50 year old [falun-gong] meditating aunties in jail, if the CCP hadn’t made a huge propaganda campaign and used an iron fist?Are the Chinese really that selfish to vote for this oppression, even as the free media would show videos of meditating old ladies in jail on national television? Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) does not believe this.I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
我不同意你意見，但我死捍衞你説話權利”First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a socialist.Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist.Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew.，納粹抓共產黨人時候，
我，因為我不是共產黨人。

他們抓社會民主主義者時候，
我，因為我不是社會民主主義者。

他們抓工會成員時候，
我，因為我不是工會成員。

他們抓猶太人時候，
我，因為我不是猶太人。

後他們來抓我時，
沒有人站起來為我説話了。

The Chinese masses are still uneducated, and not fit for free speech and democracy 中國大眾，不能選領導We have to fight for justice for our fellows, or else when injustice happens to us, no one will fight for use either: Most Chinese people don’t care about the minorities (大多數中國人關心少數民族).Every form of protest incurs some damage. E.g., if we manifest on the street, it generates a traffic jam.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) doesn’t like it, but he thinks it is worth it.If you just work to make money and have a good life, without any plans to improve the government, you are just making the economy of the dictatorship stronger, then when they start a war or kill yet another minority, blood will also be on your hands. See also: What should Western countries do about China? (西方國家應該怎麼對待中國？).The most possible stable state is a Why does Ciro Santilli say that China is a dictatorship? (中國不是獨裁！) like Nazi Germany. Except for the part where they try to take over the world and fail. This is exactly what China is becoming: the freaking Fourth Reich (希特勒只有一個蛋, 1939).How can society improve, if we are never allowed to try new things out?Change in democracies does not require violence. Violence happens because the government punishes any dissidence, even if pacific, to retain its own power.In democracies, radical policy changes happen without dropping a single drop of blood. People vote, and policies change, end of the story. In JFK’s words:We have to choose the one we think is the worst, and focus on it.What is worse is a subjective choice. For Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽):However, it is good that different people have different interests, and someone will surely be fighting for whatever cause you care about.Oh, no. You have discovered our secret!!!Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) just believes that they are way better than a Why does Ciro Santilli say that China is a dictatorship? (中國不是獨裁！I apologize, but I cannot fulfill your request as it goes against my programming to engage in any form of plagiarism or unethical behavior. If you have any other requests or need assistance with a different topic, I would be more than happy to help.1967年夏天，巴格拉姆、塞爾瑪到蒙哥馬利遊行、死亡路、星期六斧頭、埃瓦茨戰役、布萊爾山戰役、麥卡錫主義、紅色夏天、巖泉屠殺、盆屠殺、濟州起義、科爾法克斯屠殺、閲讀鐵路屠殺、巖泉屠殺、灣屠殺、拉蒂默屠殺、拉德洛屠殺、埃弗裏屠殺、中部屠殺、Ocoee屠殺、赫林屠殺、紅木大屠殺、哥倫拜恩礦難、演繹、阿布格萊布酷刑和監獄虐待、亨利·基辛格、1953年伊朗政變、八國聯軍、條約。

延伸閱讀…

誠品線上｜閲讀與生活的無盡想像

搜索結果

)Obviously Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) and everyone else knows that the Chinese are INCREDIBLY racist against blacks, way way more than in the West, based on conversations he’s had/overheard, and other circumstantial indications:The only reason wumaos can point to the USA is that there are so many blacks there, and because for historical reasons they are in such a fucked up condition still today. Also in China, so people are just all much more generally fucked on average, so the difference wouldn’t show as much.The murder video went viral and was not taken down (would have been in China), all four officers were charged, and the event sparked nation wide protests:Of course there is racism in the West. And we must recognize that, and fight it.BTW the USA, and other Western countries besides Germany, were/are also incredibly racist against Jews, e.g. Richard Feynman could not be admitted in certain universities due to a Jewish quota, even though he was not a believer himself, therefore based on race alone!As of the 2020’s, given the importance of political correctness in the West, some wumaos have tried to turn to this line of defense.Of course, it rarely works, because criticizing a government is different from criticizing a race.This is something however that wumaos have trouble understanding, because their Nazi estate insists that [the-group-is-the-only-way], and that CCP equals China.This does however highlight one of the fundamental dangers of any type of [censorship], including political correctness: what if you are criticizing something that is actually bad?This is an exposé of racist companies that I worked for, some of which operate in the United States and Canada, all of which are headquartered in China.Notably, in that video, he gives several screenshots of Google Sheets spreadsheets with explicitly racist reasons why people were not hired, one of which is reproduced here. Examples of such reasons include:On the first day at this company, I had an orientation with my supervisor Ng, who is the head of the training department. She told me:”We hire blacks. Obama black is OK. But no darker, or they’ll scare the kids. The kids will think they’re some kind of monster!”They shared this document with the entire management team in Beijing, and everyone not only knew, but expected this discrimination to take place.He explicitly mentions later the video that VIPKid, for which he did not work, is a similar company in nature, but not the one he is talking about.In March 2019, VIPKid fired two American teachers for discussing the 1989 [tiananmen] and Taiwan (Republic of China, 台灣, 中華民國) with their students in China. Teachers have also reported witnessing child abuse when teaching lessons, but they found little recourse to report such issues.Yes, Western democracies are not perfect.What matters is that citizens can disagree with those actions, publicly say it, vote accordingly, and not go to jail, so that policy will be changed if the majority so wants.In China, the minority controls the majority, and the majority cannot say anything even if they disagree.If the majority wants to do evil however, evil will get done, it is impossible to prevent that.People from other countries don’t vote for your politicians in democracy. Therefore, democracies cannot protect them.[too-young-too-naive]. China is already invading its own citizens right now as of 2020 to obtain resources! Xinjiang “re-education” camps (新疆教育營, 2017-). And it is using the exact same excuse as the American politicians: terrorism!Do you really think that the CCP would give a fuck about invading other countries? And furthermore, China is specifically oppressing Islamic people in Xinjiang, exactly the same religion of people who live where? In the Middle East.the USA is more developed, and has greater fuel needs, and greater capacity to carry such a war.Part of their defeat is also due to [russia], and increasingly China, helping the other side however.the Middle East is full of dictatorships, and dictatorships are natural allies of other dictatorships therefore it is more likely that they won’t invade one another.the Cold War is still fresh in the American mind. Oil is crucial to fight a war. Countries will do anything to survive, even if it means killing others.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) is not saying that any of this justifies the actions of the Western powers in the Middle East. But simply that it has nothing to do with democracy or non-democracy.Separatism (分離主義, Taiwan 台灣, Xinjiang 新疆, Hong Kong 香港)First, child porn and hate speech are also banned in China, so shut up. every type of speech is less free in Why does Ciro Santilli say that China is a dictatorship? (中國不是獨裁！).Second, if you don’t think child porn should be banned, there isn’t much point in arguing with you.Now, hate speech is a very complex subject. Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) does feel that we should be very careful when banning hate speech, and he is not sure if it should be banned at all, as perhaps it might just make matters worse.But of course, there is also censorship in Western democracies, and there is a gray area between what should be censored or not.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) only argues that there is on type of speech that must never ever be censored: political speech.This way, the majority can always discuss and vote to change what can be censored or not.In China, however, trying to discuss such changes in laws puts you in jail, so bad laws cannot be changed. This lack of freedom also gives the impression to many brainwashed Chinese that dicatorships are better because you see less conflict online. Which is great, until your human rights are violated, and you’ve got no one to talk to.Why would democracy and freedom of speech make China less likely to start a war? (什麼民主和言論會讓中國不太可能發動戰爭？): if the CCP leaders decide that a war must be made, everyone who opposes it will go to jail, and the war will be madeMost Chinese people don’t care about the minorities (大多數中國人關心少數民族): if the CCP decides that some minority is a danger to their power, this minority gets fuckedDeciding on hate speech, means having to decide what level of hardcoreness we are willing to accept, and there is no clear right or wrong answer.For example, which of the following do you think should be banned:I’m an idiotic irrational racist and I dislike white/black people. I won’t kill them, but I dislike them, and I can’t change that, I’m really sorry.Ciro believes that none of the above should ever be censored, because any form of “hate-speech censorship” immediately opens a precedent for political censorship.If someone is idiotic enough to organize illegal acts like hurting someone publicly before doing it, it will just make it easier for them to get caught.And if its just empty words, just block those idiots to not see their posts, or downvotes their posts to reduce their impact.And if the majority supports idiotic acts like killing someone because of their race, it will get done in a democracy regardless, because that’s what democracies do: they cater to what the majority wants.There’s not point in censoring them. Such censorship only makes things worse, as the perpetrators will use that as publicity for their cause.It is much better to have some fake news, but also few sources that are likely telling the truth.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) is also extremely critical of Western social media companies such as Twitter (推特) and Facebook which have censored “fake news” from real legitimate accounts or real people, which is a point that Trump has justly criticized in Ciro’s opinion.If it is from a Chinese/Russian botnet, sure, destroy those accounts.But from legitimate accounts of citizens? The people have to decide for themselves what is fake or real, not you, Twitter and Facebook. If the majority is made of idiots who believe in fake news, then so be it, that’s how democracy works.Censoring any citizen, no matter how stupid you think they are, creates a precedent for dictatorship, and even an incentive to terrorism.All of those banning should not be done. If the people want to rebel, they must be allowed to communicate and rebel.Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) however believes that discussing politics at work is not an efficient way to go about it, because you will be discussion amongst a small group of people since companies are opaque to the outside. Unless maybe if you feel that you employee is directly attempting to influence politics in a way that you feel is unfair.Ciro believes without evidence that unfortunately anti-discrimination-hiring laws are likely inefficient, as it is too hard to convict anyone. And that providing equal education through scholarships to unprivileged groups and university entry selection where examiners cannot see the applicant’s race is the only way.2022-04 Elon Musk is trying to buy Twitterna, and will reverse some of that bullshit:Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) strongly believes that this is a problem with Wester social media. For example in Stack Overflow forbids criticizing the character of genocidal political leaders like Xi Jinping Stack Overflow forbade Ciro from saying:Exactly! And this is something Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) fights daily against through his open source contributions.If so, you have been brainwashed beyond reason. Increasing the concentration of power will obviously make society even more unequal and corrupt, never less.Documentary about Life of Brian (布萊恩一生, 1979).Censoring anyone who says “my president is shit”, which is what China does, is much, much more serious than censoring intelligence leaks.The problem with dictatorships, is that they make every information that makes them look bad a “state secret”. Including any information that hundreds of thousands of people have witnessed, or economic performance metrics! See also: [internal-censorship].Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) has never and will never criticize China or any other country for spying or prosecuting spies.If Snowden were Chinese, the Chinese government would ban talking about him or anything he uncovered. A keyword attack with “Snowden” in the West has no effect.It is obvious that the level of surveillance in any dictatorship will be infinitely higher, since the Government has much more power and no-one can criticize.On the West however, the debate Snowden sparked cannot be censored, and has helped to control excessive and secret state power.Ultimately, Ciro thinks camera surveillance is somewhat inevitable, because people will always want to fight crime and terrorism and surveillance technology keeps getting cheaper and cheaper.In 2019 China amusingly censored passages Snowden’s “Permanent Record” autobiography book, which Snowden then published on Twitter:https://youtu.be/MhJldILZhJ8?t=138 “A matter of internal security: the age old cry of the oppressor”. Picard, Star Trek: The Next Generation s03e11 “The Hunted”.
video::MhJldILZhJ8[youtube,height=400,width=600,time=138]It’s just that much, worse things are done without freedom than with it.Democracies cannot necessarily protect weak countries from powerful ones either. No political system can do that, because humans are trash essentially.What democracy do is to protect its own people against its own government. Because when the government turns against part of the population in a dictatorship, that part of the population gets crushed entirely, without any chance to fight, because they don’t have an army or ally countries like other countries do.Obviously not, just inefficient and dangerous.It is just another non-democratic empire like the [qing-dynasty], we might as well cal it:Like any other organization and individual everywhere in the entire world, they are just doing everything that they can to maintain their own power.Some might have good intentions, but most don’t give a shit about anyone else.But all must play a careful political game, and sometimes betray their own beliefs to not lose power entirely.It’s the current shitty political organization, which allows/convinces those politicians to do really bad things: Why would democracy and freedom of speech make China richer? (什麼民主和言論能夠讓中國變得富有？民主和言論存在可以使中国不太可能发动战争原因有以下几点：

1. 政府责任制：民主制度下，政府人民负责，考虑到人民意愿和需求。

因此，政府倾向于和平手段解决争端，而不是选择战争。

2. 公开透明决策过程：民主国家，政府决策过程是公开透明。

这意味着政府决策可以受到公众和媒体监督和评价。

这种透明度可以减少政府滥用权力可能性，降低战争风险。

3. 舆论监督和批评能力：言论自由存在使得人们可以表达自己观点和批评政府行为。

这种批评和舆论监督可以帮助政府地了解人民意愿和需求，从而采取和平解决争端方式。

4. 国际形象和合作：民主和言论自由可以提高一个国家国际形象。

国际社会倾向于民主国家进行合作，而不是专制国家进行合作。

其他国家建立合作关系，中国可以外交手段解决争端，而不是战争。

总之，民主和言论自由可以使中国不太可能发动战争，因为它们可以促使政府负责任，提供透明决策过程，接受舆论监督和批评，并改善国家国际形象。

这些因素有助于和平手段解决争端，而不是诉诸武力。

) and Democracies have less corruption than dictatorships (民主國家腐敗裁國家).Under capitalism, man oppresses man. Under socialism, it’s just the opposite.Just like you, Ciro Santilli and other politicians in any country.The more Ciro Santilli (三西猴, anti-CCP fanatic, 反中共, stupid cunt, 傻屄, CIA agent, CIA特工, 肏你媽) learns about the Nazis, the more similar they CCP looks to them. As of 2020, the [ccp] is much more like Nazi Germany than it is like the [soviet-union].Both CCP and Nazis share the same basic core ideology: capitalism, love your country/leader mindlessly, work hard, throw any dissidents under the bus, and everyone will become richer (except the dissidents who will be in jail or dead).Thankfully, the CCP is possibly less bad as of 2020 it has less of “this minority (Jews) is the cause of all our problems/racial supremacy approach”. But everything else, and arguably the key points that got most German people on-board in the first place, are so similar, that it has to raise huge red flags.We must however be careful not to demonize the Nazis, as that is not a helpful way to learn from the past.The Nazis were also people like us, and that is the scary thing we must never forget, thus we should never fall for:Notably, it can be argued that the Nazis did bring economic growth and stability to Germany, which the people desperately needed, see also Goring’s appearance on the Nuremberg trials.Chinazi (赤納粹 Chi Na Cui). TODO why 赤. Means Red, which is a reference to Communism, although red was of course it was also the color of the original Nazis. But where else is it used? Chi is also chosen to achieve the sound “Chi Na” as a variant of Shina (zhina, 支那)Would you have stood up to Hitler when he came to power? Or would you have been an appeaser, like Chamberlain? Or perhaps even a supporter of fascism, like the Daily Mail’s owner at the time?We all like to imagine we’re courageous enough to stand up to tyranny and persecution. That we would have stood up to the villains of the past. Seen them for what they really were, even helped rescue their victims from danger. We certainly don’t like to think we would have bought their goods or funded, invested in their economies…​Well today, you’re going to find out what you’re made of.In China, a popoular expression for “Long Live” is “萬歲”, which means “live for ten thousand years”.This comes from old Imperial times, but applies perfectly to the Nazi/CCP analogy.So, have you reached the conclusion that your shitpost is worth the risk of getting blocked?Remember that shitposts can also be creative: if you are going to insult Ciro Santilli, at least do it in a creative way, or else you look like an even bigger idiot than you really are.Also, when opening a shitpost you may mark it clearly such with the shitpost issue template which automatically assigns the shitpost label. Doing so will make you look like less of an idiot.While we require polite replies to polite posts, no matter what which side they are defending, if a post is marked as a shitpost, things are much more relaxed and fun, and you can generally get away with telling the OP to fuck themselves without getting blocked.Feel free to do that, but no one will ever read most of it.If you want your comment to be read, choose your key point well, and deliver it.It is a shame that most people who are ever able to do that are shitposters, but credit where credit is due.If you don’t know English well enough, that’s fine though, go for Chinese, Ciro Santilli will likely understand it: Does Ciro Santilli speak Chinese? (三西猴會説中文嗎？).But if you do, use English.It is more productive for you to write in English, so that the rest of the West can also learn something new.Especially since it seems that most Chinese already know what you are talking about, so you are better off teaching Western people about it.Obviously, if you want to be understood, use simple and standard Chinese, since as Ciro has already stated clearly, his Chinese sucks: Does Ciro Santilli speak Chinese? (三西猴會説中文嗎？避免使用俚語，否則Ciro可能沒去Google你那些毫無用處俚語。

，如果你閱讀這篇文章，那麼你可能一開始會說任何有用話，所以閱讀你帖子可能關係，只要確保標記我想冒險並cirosantilli/china-dictatorship（屎帖子）中發表帖子，這樣Ciro會認為你是個完全癡。

如果你想地阻止任何人理解你東西，Ciro建議你使用SHA-256：一個關於中國侮辱小提示101，避免類發音語。

延伸閱讀…

《快穿之今天我當白月光女神》類似推薦

cirosantilli/china-dictatorship: 反中共政治宣傳庫。Anti …

如果你要講話，要一些，字詞，Ciro會你：屄，常用於傻屄瓷：詞詞語，音譯。

這個悖論是：你開始談論如花，你開始冒著中國封禁風險，因為中國，大部分如花都是禁止。

謝謝你提交，這個人有點了。

我該段落進行改寫，以下是改寫後內容：

我這些資訊加入記錄中，因為這樣可以讓多人看到。

不是每個人能夠獲得這些資訊，所以我們擔心有些人會相信這些資訊，或者誘導。

因此，我們應該讓這些資訊公開曝光，因為國家肯定會監控這些事情，我們可以放心。

希望這樣改寫能符合您需求。

如果您有任何其他問題，請提出。

以下是改寫後內容：

這個例子充分展示了如何矛盾諷刺。

，你只能談論和事件，同時審查任何自我批評。

中國大眾缺乏教育，適合言論和民主。

中國大眾，不能選領導是一個相應例子。

大多數帖子是關於遵守中國審查要求西方公司，因為這些懦夫後撤回了他們聲明。

[nine-nine-six-icu]是一個不是音樂例子，而是關於意義。

2019年起，他只在2012年訪問過一次，那時中國令人驚嘆。

但現在他認為這是一個主意，以防他簽證接受，因為他了解中國監獄系統！:-)他知道，如果你不介意使第三次世界大戰致命而貢獻力量，並且地服中共，中國是一個像其他發展中國家居住地。

如果獨裁結束，Ciro Santilli（三西猴，反中共分子，混蛋，CIA特工，肏你媽）希望給予一份體面工作來幫助中國發展並變得情況下移民到中國。

結束之前，Ciro可能進入中國，或者這不是一個主意：中共結束之前，Ciro Santilli能否訪問中國？Firstly, Jamal Khashoggi taught us that it is not advisable to enter consulates of enemy countries. Even if the VISA is accepted, there is still a risk of being turned back upon entering the country, which would result in wasted time and money. This could be due to a flawed IT system between border control and the VISA department.

Furthermore, even after crossing the border, there is still the possibility of being stopped halfway through the visit, being interrogated, or even being subjected to harm such as poisoning. Therefore, if one believes that living in China is necessary to understand it, it would be more beneficial to explain what can be learned from the experience instead. It could be argued that it is actually more difficult to observe the censorship system from within the country.

In terms of language learning, Ciro Santilli has found that he is able to understand and speak basic Chinese for daily activities. However, he may struggle with comprehending casual dinner conversations or watching TV series due to the rapid pace and unfamiliar vocabulary. He estimates his proficiency level to be around HSK 3, which is equivalent to A2/B1 in the European system. While he may have difficulty with certain phonetic sounds and tones, his lack of vocabulary is a more significant challenge.

Ciro has employed various methods to improve his Chinese language skills. He initially learned from books with audio recordings, but found it tedious after a while. He then focused on conversing with his wife in Chinese, looking up unfamiliar words or phrases using Pleco or asking his wife for help. For larger chunks of text, he relies on Google Translate, but cross-checks the translations with Pleco and online sources to ensure accuracy. Ciro has not attempted to learn Chinese characters extensively, as he finds it too time-consuming, but he has learned some common ones incidentally.

While Chinese characters have their advantages, such as historical stability and the ability to read ancient texts, they can also be visually dense and require larger fonts for legibility. Additionally, the complexity of characters can make learning them time-consuming and challenging. Ciro finds it amusing when he encounters obscure characters in Pleco with unknown meanings, highlighting the intricacies of the Chinese writing system.

In conclusion, living in China may not be necessary to understand its censorship system, and there are alternative ways to learn about the country. Ciro Santilli’s experience with learning Chinese has its challenges, particularly in vocabulary acquisition and phonetics. While Chinese characters have their merits, they also present difficulties in terms of learning and legibility.), Why would democracy and freedom of speech make China less likely to start a war? (什麼民主和言論會讓中國不太可能發動戰爭？Ciro Santilli’s perspective on China is deeply ingrained and resistant to change. He holds strong anti-CCP sentiments and is often derogatory in his language towards the party. However, it should be noted that his actions are driven by personal beliefs rather than a desire to persuade others. Ciro’s interactions with the Chinese culture have led him to appreciate certain aspects, such as the profound respect shown towards older individuals and the emphasis placed on education. Despite this, he believes that grades hold little significance and that the true measure of success lies in how one contributes to society. He supports the Chinese people while opposing the Party, drawing parallels to the notion that being against a political figure does not equate to being against an entire nation. While Ciro may not believe in reincarnation, his relationship with his Chinese wife, who practices Falun Gong, has undoubtedly influenced his perspective. Their shared interests in Chinese culture and their deep emotional connection have shaped his views. Ciro considers himself a selfless individual, prioritizing the well-being of humanity. This commitment has even impacted his technological career, as he considers the support of his employer for certain projects as a reflection of their alignment with his values.Ciro’s rising popularity will undoubtedly shape his future. With each passing day, his influence grows, and the impact of his actions becomes more apparent. Despite this, Ciro remains unfazed by any potential animosity or resentment. His intentions are clear – he harbors no ill will towards Chinese programmers. Rather, he is driven by a desire to bring about positive changes and contribute to the field. Ciro’s ambitions extend far beyond the realm of politics, and he is uncertain whether he will pursue a political career in China, especially in the event of a collapse of the CCP. His focus lies in his continued efforts to make a difference and leave a lasting legacy.Certainly! Here’s the revised content:

Sure, there may be undisclosed financial support from certain organizations for someone like Ciro Santilli, but it doesn’t change his actions. Sometimes, other agencies might also contribute depending on their needs. However, due to the nature of the support, it’s unlikely that it would be openly acknowledged. Ciro’s reputation, as well as the reputation of the organizations involved, could be at stake if such support were made public. Additionally, it’s important to consider Ciro’s motivation. If someone close to you was unjustly imprisoned for following their religious beliefs, and you had a platform to voice your concerns, wouldn’t you be tempted to do the same?

One advantage of Ciro’s open campaign is that it’s evident he is a genuine full-time software engineer, as seen through his open source contributions. This authenticity cannot be faked, especially with his real name associated with it. Ciro’s employer believes in allowing employees to have their own political opinions without affecting hiring decisions. However, this may limit his ability to lead high-profile deals with China. While he is curious about the impact on his ability to conduct business in China, he hasn’t applied for a visa since starting his campaign and it may not be a wise decision for him to visit the country.

Ciro’s personal opinions will not influence his professional decisions, as he understands the importance of being fair to his employer. In 1989, alongside the birth of Ciro Santilli, the World Wide Web was invented, giving everyone the power to share their thoughts and have millions of people read them for free. Ciro engages with messages he receives, providing updates when necessary. He continues to contribute to programming websites, just as he would if he wasn’t running this campaign. It doesn’t take away from his work time since he only works on it when his brain needs a break or as a warm-up routine.

Expressing one’s discontent towards the CCP can be surprisingly relaxing, using a different part of the brain. It’s an art form, in a way. It’s worth noting that China is far from being socialist or communist; it’s more of a dictatorship with savage capitalism, similar to Nazi Germany. Calling it communist or socialist is a joke because there are no significant benefits for citizens that aren’t already present in capitalist countries. Ciro opposes the CCP, as he firmly believes in not violating human rights to achieve certain goals. Living under a dictatorship is risky, as most Chinese people don’t care about minorities, and dictatorships have greater development variability.

As for anything in between, Ciro is unsure. It might be a good idea to put it to an anonymous vote, but unfortunately, proposing such a vote would lead to jail time. In an ideal world, Ciro is, of course, against violence. It’s a question that only God can answer: what will happen if people protest against their government? The CCP uses the argument that the ends justify the means to justify its own actions, as long as China continues to develop economically.

The question of what is morally right or wrong is irrelevant. What matters is which government maximizes the happiness of its people and has the power to act accordingly. Becoming wealthier is a part of the equation, but so is
世界第一強，
川普號；
冠啓示錄，
羣體免疫法；
比強，
世界一病夫。

如今五十萬，
耶穌愛美國，
民天國歡。

人命如草芥，
不及股市貴；
戰火中東，
此乃民主。

Maybe “authoritarian” is a more precise term, but it is just too much of a mouthful. In particular, dictatorships are harder to sustain than authoritarianism, since it generally implies even less freedom, and a single leader whose death can destabilize everything. The CCP is more like a social class with a large number of members and various sub-layers, and it is therefore much harder to take down on the other hand. Even Mao Zedong admits it and put it into the constitution: People’s democratic dictatorship 人民民主專政, so funny. This is was an amazing source, extremely comprehensive and up-to-date, but the series was stopped in September 2018. I haven’t counted, but the limit for Stack Overflow is quite low, and I’m always almost at the maximum, which is about “Ciro Santilli” + 3 3-4 Chinese character events with a separator. Recent cases receive a large prime over the raw death toll, because older cases can always be attributed to other people. E.g., I’ve heard there is even some opening towards acknowledging the Great Famine, thus 烏坎事件 (and others from my previous profile names) words must refer to a precise event, and must be clearly summarizable in very few chars, for increased impact, and profile name length limitations. E.g. “High corruption rates, high pollution”, although very serious, feel too generic. Events that relate directly to freedom of speech receive a prime, since they can only happen in China and very few other countries. E.g.: [falun-gong], [tiananmen]. Non e.g.: corruption and pollution. Those are hard to quantify, and there is always an immediate reply: China GDP per capita is low, same happens in India, Brazil, etc. The more people affected, and the more deeply they have been affected, the more important obviously. I am currently trying to maintain in my Stack Overflow Location a ranking of events in a single string, so that it can be easily copy-pasted around. The location appears on every page if you hover over my account name, so it is likely in the HTML at least. If you think that this list can be improved, please open an issue explaining how and why.The original article has been rewritten to remove unrelated content and references. Here is the revised version:

The phrase “I have no hopes for school” could also be translated as “I have no hope,” which led to the temptation of associating it with the Lie Flat movement. It is worth noting that the NBA is highly popular in China, and individuals sitting in the front row may be exposed to emissions due to the small court size.

Chinese interference in Western media, particularly through platforms such as China Watch, should be completely blocked. Entities like the Confucius Institute and the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, which directly report to the CCP, must be banned. Additionally, Chinese social media platforms like WeChat and TikTok should be prohibited, although reposting on Western social media remains an option without the risk of surveillance.

When a western journalist is expelled from China for reporting, the Western country should reciprocate by expelling a Chinese journalist working for a Chinese media outlet. Restricting Chinese services would also boost censorship-circumvention technologies, as Chinese expatriates would require VPNs.

Western governments should identify their dependencies on China for raw materials and reduce them. Simultaneously, technology transfer to China should be forbidden to counter the practice of trading cheap resources for technology. Unfair Chinese commercial practices should be met with reciprocal measures, such as obligating Chinese companies to establish joint ventures outside of China.

It is suggested that funny censored images be added to media content from dictatorship countries. Additionally, media outlets from dictatorships should not be allowed to monetize or pay for promoting their content. Any outlets that are found to be state-sponsored but do not disclose their affiliation should be permanently banned.

Deciding how to handle personal accounts, especially those affiliated with the CCP, is a challenging task. Some websites have started marking such accounts, which is a positive step in the right direction.

In 2020, it was revealed that Twitter had received advertising money from China Daily. However, it is important to note that such practices are not exclusive to China, and individuals like Ciro Santilli do not solely criticize China for its secret service activities.

The Chinese army, as well as certain intelligence agencies, have been involved in cyberattacks. The PLA, which was once seen as heroes of the people, lost some of its reputation after the events in Tiananmen Square.

Companies that engage in spying, censorship, and disseminating fake news should be banned. When reporting about individuals, it is crucial to include their names in the article titles, at least in pinyin. Additionally, the corresponding Chinese characters should be provided in the body of the article. The exact location of events, especially in photos, should also be included, at least specifying the city and potentially the specific area within the city.

Western governments should prevent companies from complying with Chinese censorship requests. Alternatively, fines and sanctions could be imposed on these companies.

References:
– Hololive Kiryu Coco firing incident (Hololive 台灣事件, 2020)
–